Bonus points
if you get the “For Love of the Game” reference.
In
my previous two posts, I went over two of the more commonly referenced
sabermetric statistics (BABIP and HR/FB) when it comes to assessing how lucky
(or unlucky) a player has been over a small sample. This “luck” may just involve the interaction between the
ball and the bat or the field, but can also be related to the positioning of
the fielders (as with BABIP). In
attempting to judge the “true” value of a pitcher or hitter, however,
sabermetricians have tried their hardest to isolate those aspects of the game
that involve just the pitcher and the batter, and nothing else (“clearing the
mechanism,” if you will). This
leaves us with what most stat guys call the Three True Outcomes: strikeouts,
free passes (walks / hit-by-pitches), and home runs. These outcomes have formed the canon of Defense Independent
Pitching Statistics (DIPS). How
well do these few statistics actually measure the “true” ability of a player?
Obviously,
there can be a bit of discussion as to whether or not these three outcomes are
really “pure.” Yes, it is clear
that any at-bat that results in the ball being put into play introduces
variance from the skill and positioning of the players in the field, and
therefore only the set of outcomes {BB, HBP, K, HR} should be considered. The rest of the outcomes should
probably be considered through the lens of BABIP. While this seems just fine when it comes to judging the
skill of pitchers, it really is insufficient to judge the worth of a
hitter.
Take a look
at the true-outcome stats, as well as other relevant numbers, of three marquee outfielders
in 2011 (note that ISO represents Isolated Power, which is just Slugging
Percentage minus Batting Average):
|
BB%
|
K%
|
HR
|
SB
|
AVG
|
BABIP
|
ISO
|
Nick Swisher
|
15.0
|
19.7
|
23
|
3
|
.260
|
.295
|
.188
|
Andrew McCutchen
|
13.1
|
18.6
|
23
|
23
|
.259
|
.291
|
.198
|
Carlos Beltran
|
11.9
|
14.7
|
22
|
4
|
.300
|
.324
|
.225
|
None of
these players really separate from each other using the true outcome stats, but
it becomes clear upon further inspection that Swisher is an inferior commodity,
and it may be a matter of personal preference as to which of the remaining two
you would want. Why?
One
thing that the True Outcomes ignore is speed. While this has little to do with pure hitting ability, it
certainly can make a player much more desirable and productive. McCutchen stole 20 more bases than
either of the other players. While
his batting average and on-base percentage were almost identical to Swisher’s,
it can be assumed that his speed accounted for the slight advantage he held in
isolated power, as he could leg out a couple more doubles and triples with that
extra speed.
As
for Beltran, it is clear that, to some extent, his high BABIP contributed to a
higher batting average than the other two (his career BABIP is right around
.300). However, it appears that he
has an advantage over the other two players not in home-run power but in
inside-the-park power, allowing him to gain a 20-point advantage in slugging
without an advantage in the traditional power category, home runs. Upon further inspection, Beltran hit
the second-highest percentage of line drives in his career in 2011, producing a
number of doubles and triples that he hadn’t produced in several years. It becomes clear that you can still
provide extra value by hitting the ball hard inside the park, even if you don’t
hit more home runs than other players.
While
the true outcomes can form a pretty comprehensive representation of a pitcher’s
performance (and I’ll get into this more later this week), it seems like a few
other factors need to be considered with hitters. A player’s speed contributes to his batting average (through
BABIP), stolen base totals, and slugging percentage, and thus should not be
taken lightly when considering performance. Also, there is a good bit of variability of performance that
can be found between players that have the same home run total, as players who
can add a good amount of doubles and triples are much more valuable and likely
to have consistent success over the course of a season or career.
No comments:
Post a Comment